Latest news with #fuel efficiency
Auto Car
3 days ago
- Automotive
- Auto Car
These are the most fuel-efficient cars on sale today - and this is the MPG they REALLY achieve...
Close Finding a car that sips fuel rather than guzzles it has long been a top priority for many drivers, but it seems it's more important than ever to make your money - and fuel - stretch as far as possible. With fluctuating fuel prices and increasing environmental awareness, the appeal of a highly economical car is at an all-time high - but with so many models on the market, how do you pinpoint the ones that truly excel in fuel efficiency? It's one thing to read the official miles-per-gallon (MPG) figures published by manufacturers, but these numbers are often achieved in ideal conditions and not easily replicated in the real world. To help you make a more informed decision, we've compiled a list of all the most economical cars on sale today. To see if they're up to snuff, we've also included our own economy results for each model – with some surprising results. This list includes petrol, diesel, mild-hybrid and full-hybrid models. We've excluded plug-in hybrid cars here, because their officially advertised economy figures are often highly unrealistic and rely on large, charged-up batteries. We've also excluded fully-electric models here, but you can see our list of the longest-range electric cars, plus our compilation of the most efficient electric cars and their real-world results. The top pick based on official figures is the frugal Mazda 2, but you'll have to read on to see what it actually scored in the real world. So whether you're a daily commuter, a budget-conscious buyer or simply looking to reduce your carbon footprint, these vehicles represent some of the best choices available for maximising your miles per gallon. Design 7 Interior 8 Performance 6 Ride & Handling 8 Costs 8 Efficient powertrain makes for reasonable running costs Surprisingly sharp handling and fun on the right roads Toyota engineering mixes well with Mazda design cues The Toyota Yaris is basically the same car and is a bit cheaper Other cars in this class are better to drive Claimed economy: 74.3mpg Our economy: 60.3mpg The Mazda 2 is sold as one of the most economical cars on sale today, with a remarkable advertised economy figure of 74.3mpg. You might be thinking that this small Japanese hatchback looks familiar, and you'd be correct. The Mazda 2 is in effect a rebadged Toyota Yaris, sharing most of its underpinnings and, crucially, its hybrid technology. It isn't a straight copy and paste, though. While the Yaris offers a choice of electrified engines ranging up to 129bhp, the Mazda 2 has just one: a 114bhp, three-cylinder 1.5-litre petrol unit, which will hit 0-62mph in 9.2sec. Our extensive drive in the Mazda 2 returned 60.3mpg, which is very respectable indeed, if not quite as high as Mazda advertises. Finance this car with Drivenfi 2. Toyota Yaris 8 Design 7 Interior 8 Performance 6 Ride & Handling 8 Costs 9 Pros Excellent manners around town, where it's brisk but calming Hardly scintillating to drive but dynamically very well sorted Great economy Cons Frugal powertrain still offers very little for the keen B-road driver Second-row passenger and boot space comes up short next to rivals Claimed economy: 70.6mpg Our economy: 62.3mpg Efficiency has always been the key mantra of the Toyota Yaris, and to this day it is a bell-ringer for low running costs. Toyota itself claims an economy figure of 70.6mpg, which differs from the mechanically similar Mazda 2 due to specification changes, such as larger wheels. You'll see a lot of those economical benefits in town, where Toyota claims the small hatchback can run on electric power for 80% of the time when travelling at low speeds. Regardless of how you drive, you're unlikely to see south of 50mpg. Our tests returned an impressive 62.3mpg in the lower-powered, 115bhp engine, while the more potent 129bhp car produced 56.3mpg. Read our Toyota Yaris review Finance this car with Drivenfi 3. Renault Clio 9 Design 9 Interior 7 Performance 7 Ride & Handling 8 Costs 9 Pros In the hybrid, seamless switch between electric and combustion power Well equipped, even on lower trim levels New interior mostly looks and feels as good as anything in the class Cons More agile, assertive handling comes at the cost of a supple ride Adults and older children won't like it in the back seats Heavier acceleration prompts a harsh growl from the 1.6-litre petrol engine Claimed economy: 67.3mpg Our economy: 59.4mpg Possibly the best small car on this list to drive every day, the Renault Clio is also one of the most economical on sale in the UK today. Two engines are available: a 1.0-litre three-cylinder petrol engine (badged TCe 90) and the full hybrid E-Tech. Both offer impressive levels of frugality, with the pure petrol car claiming 54.3mpg and the full hybrid 67mpg. Should you opt for the E-Tech, you'll also get 143bhp and 106lb ft, with a 0-62mph time of 9.3sec. Our real-world tests returned 59.4mpg with this powertrain, while the TCe 90 resulted in routine scores over 50mpg. More impressive still is the Clio's price point, starting at £18,995 for the petrol and £21,895 for the hybrid, making it one of the cheapest electric cars on sale. Read our Renault Clio review Finance this car with Drivenfi 4. Peugeot 208 7 Design 9 Interior 4 Performance 7 Ride & Handling 6 Costs 7 Pros Looks great Easy and relatively fun to drive High-quality finish for a supermini Cons Multiple excellent rivals Tricky seating position for some You have to control the temperature on the touchscreen Claimed economy: 65.9mpg Our economy: N/A The Peugeot 208 is billed as the most efficient car to come from the Stellantis stable, with a claimed economy of 65.9mpg in its most penny-pinching set-up. Three engine options are available, including two mild hybrids ranging from 99bhp to 134bhp. There's a regular turbocharged petrol engine too, while the e-208 takes care of those after a fully electric model. According to Peugeot, the most efficient model is the 208 Hybrid 110. The standard petrol is still a good choice for economy, though, with a claimed figure of 58.2mpg. Our tests in the standard petrol didn't live up to Peugeot's claim: we hit 47.9mpg. We're yet to properly test the hybrid on an in-depth economy run, but we anticipate the results to be far superior to the standard petrol. Read our Peugeot 208 review Finance this car with Drivenfi 5. Volkswagen Golf 9 Design 8 Interior 8 Performance 8 Ride & Handling 9 Costs 8 Pros Excellent refinement, drivability and efficiency Wonderfully rounded driving manners and, on adaptive dampers, a comfortable ride Updated multimedia is a huge step forward Cons Mk8 look is a little fussy and derivative for some Somewhat expensive Some remaining doubts about the tech's reliability Claimed economy: 64.6mpg Our economy: 60.3mpg The venerable Volkswagen Golf has several powertrains capable of remarkable economy figures, ranging from pure petrol to plug-in hybrids with 88 miles of electric range. Away from plug-in hybrids, though, the two best picks for economy are the 150PS eTSI mild-hybrid or the now old-school 2.0 TDI. Both throw up some seriously impressive figures. When we roadtested the eTSI mild-hybrid, the Golf returned a figure of 60.0mpg, and the 2.0 TDI inched ahead of it with 60.3mpg. Both considered motorway miles and some more throttle-heavy B-road driving, and ultimately shows the Golf is still close to the top of the class for commuting. Read our Volkswagen Golf review Finance this car with Drivenfi 6. Skoda Octavia 8 Design 9 Interior 8 Performance 8 Ride & Handling 8 Costs 9 Pros Hugely practical and spacious Pleasant, comfortable on-road demeanour Economical engines Cons Not a particularly dynamic drive Iffy build quality in places Looks more like a generic saloon than it ever has Claimed economy: 64.2mpg Our economy: 60mpg The largest car on this list, the Skoda Octavia, offers a similar powertrain selection to the Volkswagen Golf. Its most impressive economy figure is offered by the same 2.0 TDI we enjoyed in the Golf but with a claimed figure of 64.2mpg. Our tests returned a frugal 60mpg, making the Octavia perfect for motorway driving. It's a genuienly long-range warrior, and you'd likely get around 500 miles out of a single tank of fuel. You should also consider the 1.5 mild-hybrid, however. Like the Golf, you could likely see above 70mpg in the right conditions, meaning additional savings. Read our Skoda Octavia review Finance this car with Drivenfi 7. Suzuki Swift 8 Design 8 Interior 7 Performance 7 Ride & Handling 8 Costs 8 Pros Light and compact dimensions make it a doddle to drive in town Nicely engaging drive for something of its price Well-equipped, easy-to-use cabin Cons Fidgety ride ADAS deactivation is frustratingly overcomplicated Spongy brakes Claimed economy: 64.2mpg Our economy: 60.3mpg The Suzuki Swift is a small car with bags of character, owing to its involving chassis, energetic handling and enjoyable manual gearbox. Another reason it's worth considering is its economical powertrain, of which there is a sole option: a 1.2-litre naturally aspirated three-cylinder engine with mild-hybrid assistance. Suzuki claims it's 7% more efficient than the engine it replaced, achieving an official figure of 64.2mpg when selected with a manual gearbox. Best of all, we found this figure to be absolutely achievable in the real world, hitting an average of 60.3mpg in our roadtest. Read our Suzuki Swift review Finance this car with Drivenfi 8. Toyota Corolla 9 Design 8 Interior 7 Performance 8 Ride & Handling 10 Costs 9 Pros Comfortable, easy-to-use interior Ride-handling balance is spot on for a family hatch Design is stylish and modern yet inoffensive Cons Interior and multimedia look and feel somewhat dated Not especially roomy compared with rivals CVT gearbox can make engine noise intrusive Claimed economy: 62.4mpg Our economy: 60mpg It's no surprise to see the Toyota Corolla on a list of the most economical cars on sale. The Japanese rival to the Volkswagen Golf is a byword for economy and efficiency in the industry. Toyota claims an outstanding 62.4mpg from its entry-level 1.8-litre hybrid engine, and 62.7mpg in the more powerful 2.0-litre car. Our long-term test of the Corolla which used a 1.8-litre variant, returned a figure of 60mpg, but in some instances our tester even hit as high as 72.6mpg. We've used our average figure here to illustrate the Corolla's day-to-day economy, but we reckon those low-70 figures will be achievable on a regular basis. Read our Toyota Corolla review Finance this car with Drivenfi 9. Honda Jazz 7 Design 8 Interior 9 Performance 6 Ride & Handling 7 Costs 7 Pros Fuel economy is exceptional, even without trying Interior practicality is easily up there with the best in class Cons Remains a fairly bland, if secure, device to drive Doesn't do much to shake its slightly dull image Official economy: 62.8mpg Our economy: 56mpg The Honda Jazz is another economical option in the real world, complete with an EV-only mode and some enticing numbers on paper. Power comes from an e:HEV full hybrid system, which combines a 1.5-litre petrol engine with a battery and two electric motors to produce 120bhp and 187lb ft. Honda quotes a figure of 62.8mpg, but our tests returned slightly less economical 56mpg. Still, impressive nonetheless. It's not far off the Toyota Yaris, and the Honda actually comes closer to hitting its claimed figure. Rivals like the Yaris and the Clio might save you more in the long run, though, when you consider the Jazz's significantly higher list price, which starts at around £28,000. Read our Honda Jazz review Finance this car with Drivenfi 10. Vauxhall Corsa 7 Design 8 Interior 6 Performance 7 Ride & Handling 7 Costs 8 Pros Less dumpy, functional design boosts visual allure Torquey, keen, decently economical engines Richer-seeming interior with better on-board technology Cons Remote if competent, slightly unengaging handling Ride can be firm, restive and a little wooden-feeling Second-row cabin space has gone backwards Claimed economy: 61.4mpg Our economy: 58.7mpg Vauxhall's alternative to the Peugeot 208 is the Vauxhall Corsa, with which it shares its underpinnings and its hybrid engine. The result is another frugal supermini with lots of potential to boost your daily economy, with a claimed figure of 61.4mpg when using the 1.2-litre hybrid engine. Our tests in the entry-level 1.2-litre turbocharged petrol car, equipped with the manual gearbox, returned 51.8mpg. Our long-term test in the hybrid produced an even more impressive 57.8mpg. Importantly, the Vauxhall was consistently economical over our long-term test, meaning it should be ideal to live with day to day. Read our Vauxhall Corsa review Finance this car with Drivenfi Choosing the best economical car isn't simply down to its miles-per-gallon figure. You'll likely want a practical car, too, which puts the Skoda Octavia and Volkswagen Golf near the top of our list. If you're after a smaller model, there are several other options on this list to fulfil your needs. Regardless, all cars here will easily achieve 50mpg and above with careful driving. This list draws upon lived experiences from the Autocar roadtest team, as well as our long-term test car drivers. All figures are reported in European miles-per-gallon (MPG), while official manufacturer figures are based on the WLTP test cycle. This list includes petrol, diesel, mild-hybrid and full-hybrid models. Economy figures are calculated on a closed test track and take into account 'touring' economy and 'everyday' economy. 'Touring' economy is representative of UK motorway driving, and 'everyday' economy accounts for intra-urban driving. We've excluded plug-in hybrid cars due to unrealistic economy figures often in the several hundreds of miles per gallon, which we deem as unrealistic unless you keep the batteries charged. Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you'll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here. Next Prev In partnership with
Yahoo
21-07-2025
- Automotive
- Yahoo
US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance
US regulators have waived fines for automakers failing to meet fuel efficiency standards dating back to the 2022 model year, following a new law signed by President Donald Trump. This move, part of a tax and budget bill, puts an end to fines under the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) rules established by a 1975 energy law. In a letter obtained by Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has informed automakers that it is re-evaluating its fuel economy regulations. The move aligns with other measures from Washington aimed at easing the production of gasoline vehicles and increasing the cost of electric vehicle (EV) sales. In the past, non-compliance with US fuel economy requirements has led to significant penalties for automakers. Stellantis, the parent company of Chrysler, incurred a $190.7m civil penalty for the 2019 and 2020 model years, adding to around $400m in fines from 2016 to 2019. Previously, General Motors (GM) paid $128.2m for 2016 and 2017. President Trump's recent actions also include nullifying California's goal to phase out gasoline-only vehicle sales by 2035. Meanwhile, Tesla has benefited from the situation, earning $2.8bn globally from regulatory credits through the sale of zero-emission EVs. The legislation signed this month by Trump states that vehicle fines will be eliminated for any year where NHTSA has not completed its rulemaking process. Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign director Dan Becker expressed disapproval of the decision, stating: "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer. 'The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines cancelled." GM and Stellantis have yet to respond to the development. Senate Republicans estimates that the law could 'save automakers' around $200m. The NHTSA under President Joe Biden proposed in 2023 to increase fuel economy standards through 2032, which would have cost the industry an estimated $14bn in fines, including $6.5bn, $3bn, and $1bn for GM, Stellantis, and Ford Motor, respectively. However, the final rule adopted last year significantly reduced these requirements, capping potential industry fines at $1.83bn from 2027 through 2031. "US automakers exempted from fines for fuel efficiency non-compliance" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Automotive
- Yahoo
US tells automakers they face no fuel economy penalties for last three years
By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a letter to automakers seen by Reuters it is working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules. The decision is one of a number made by Washington to make it easier for automakers to build gasoline-powered vehicles and to make electric vehicle sales more costly. Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis paid $190.7 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400 million for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM previously paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017. Trump last month signed a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to bar California's landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. Last year, Tesla said it received $2.8 billion in global revenue from regulatory credits it earns from selling zero-emission EVs and sells to other automakers seeking to meet vehicle emissions targets. Republican Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio said the costs automakers paid Tesla to be in compliance were "outrageous". Trump NHTSA Administrator nominee Jonathan Morrison said Wednesday at a Senate hearing "at the end of the day a consumer is going to pay for that." The law signed by Trump this month specifies that vehicle fines would be eliminated for any year that NHTSA had not finalized. Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign, criticized the decision. "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer,' Becker said. "The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines canceled." GM and Stellantis did not immediately comment. Senate Republicans estimated the law would save automakers $200 million. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing nearly all major automakers, thanked congressional leaders for addressing concerns about fuel economy rules saying "given current market conditions, the existing standards were challenging for many auto manufacturers to achieve." In 2023, under former President Joe Biden, NHTSA said its proposal to hike fuel economy standards through 2032 would cost the industry $14 billion in projected fines including $6.5 billion for GM, $3 billion for Stellantis and $1 billion for Ford Motor. The final rule adopted in 2024 eased requirements and said the auto industry would face no more than $1.83 billion in fines from 2027 through 2031. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Automotive
- Yahoo
US tells automakers they face no fuel economy penalties for last three years
By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a letter to automakers seen by Reuters it is working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules. The decision is one of a number made by Washington to make it easier for automakers to build gasoline-powered vehicles and to make electric vehicle sales more costly. Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis paid $190.7 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400 million for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM previously paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017. Trump last month signed a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to bar California's landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. Last year, Tesla said it received $2.8 billion in global revenue from regulatory credits it earns from selling zero-emission EVs and sells to other automakers seeking to meet vehicle emissions targets. Republican Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio said the costs automakers paid Tesla to be in compliance were "outrageous". Trump NHTSA Administrator nominee Jonathan Morrison said Wednesday at a Senate hearing "at the end of the day a consumer is going to pay for that." The law signed by Trump this month specifies that vehicle fines would be eliminated for any year that NHTSA had not finalized. Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign, criticized the decision. "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer,' Becker said. "The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines canceled." GM and Stellantis did not immediately comment. Senate Republicans estimated the law would save automakers $200 million. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing nearly all major automakers, thanked congressional leaders for addressing concerns about fuel economy rules saying "given current market conditions, the existing standards were challenging for many auto manufacturers to achieve." In 2023, under former President Joe Biden, NHTSA said its proposal to hike fuel economy standards through 2032 would cost the industry $14 billion in projected fines including $6.5 billion for GM, $3 billion for Stellantis and $1 billion for Ford Motor. The final rule adopted in 2024 eased requirements and said the auto industry would face no more than $1.83 billion in fines from 2027 through 2031. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Reuters
16-07-2025
- Automotive
- Reuters
US tells automakers they face no fuel economy penalties for last three years
WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a letter to automakers seen by Reuters it is working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules. The decision is one of a number made by Washington to make it easier for automakers to build gasoline-powered vehicles and to make electric vehicle sales more costly. Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis ( opens new tab paid $190.7 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400 million for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM (GM.N), opens new tab previously paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017. Trump last month signed a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to bar California's landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. Last year, Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab said it received $2.8 billion in global revenue from regulatory credits it earns from selling zero-emission EVs and sells to other automakers seeking to meet vehicle emissions targets. Republican Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio said the costs automakers paid Tesla to be in compliance were "outrageous". Trump NHTSA Administrator nominee Jonathan Morrison said Wednesday at a Senate hearing "at the end of the day a consumer is going to pay for that." The law signed by Trump this month specifies that vehicle fines would be eliminated for any year that NHTSA had not finalized. Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign, criticized the decision. "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer,' Becker said. "The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines canceled." GM and Stellantis did not immediately comment. Senate Republicans estimated the law would save automakers $200 million. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing nearly all major automakers, thanked congressional leaders for addressing concerns about fuel economy rules saying "given current market conditions, the existing standards were challenging for many auto manufacturers to achieve." In 2023, under former President Joe Biden, NHTSA said its proposal to hike fuel economy standards through 2032 would cost the industry $14 billion in projected fines including $6.5 billion for GM, $3 billion for Stellantis and $1 billion for Ford Motor (F.N), opens new tab. The final rule adopted in 2024 eased requirements and said the auto industry would face no more than $1.83 billion in fines from 2027 through 2031.
